Ep. 26 Scientific gatekeepers in the age of Twitter: A journal editor’s perspective

09/05/2018 |

1 Shares

Dr. Brahmajee Nallamothu

Are medical journals still needed in the age of the internet and social media? Our guest is Brahmajee Nallamothu, editor of the journal Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. We have a wide ranging conversation, covering everything from the financial incentives of publishing, ideological biases in medical journals, the peer review process, the Twitter effect, and a new editorial position of independent troller!

GUEST:

Brahmajee Nallamothu Twitter and Profile

LINKS:

The following articles are all Open Access articles in Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Robert W. Yeh. Academic cardiology and social media: Navigating the wisdom and madness of the crowd

Michael Thompson. Science and social media: Debating the effects of readmission penalties

RELATED EPISODES:

Ep. 23 Buying doctors with lunches: Fact or fiction?

WATCH ON YOUTUBE:

Watch the episode on our YouTube channel

1 Shares

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Breath of fresh air

05/26/2020
Outstanding guests, informed hosts. Tackle very important questions at the micro and macro crossroads where medicine meets society. I learn a lot.

by practicaldoc from United States

Great insights on our healthcare system

11/05/2019
Anybody who wants to learn about what is truly ailing our healthcare system needs to listen to this podcast. Michel and Anish do a great job showing what is jeopardizing the patient physician relationship. Entertaining and informative!

by Dch112 from United States

A little controversy is a good thing

04/02/2019
The problem with most medical podcasts is that they’re dry. Most episodes of The Accad and Koka Report are at least somewhat controversial (at least to mainstream medicine). It makes for much better listening on the morning commute.

by nephrol from United States

Finally, and interesting medical podcast

10/18/2018
Let’s face it—there are a LOT of medical podcasts out there, and most are unlistenable: narrow topics, boring hosts, unreasonable duration, etc. The Accad & Koka report is different. The hosts are opinionated and interesting, the topics are of interest to docs & laypeople alike, and the presentations are generally focused. As a physician, one would think that medical podcasts would be my catnip. True—but only good ones. This is one of them.

by transposition from United States

Amazing (true) side of healthcare

09/26/2018
This is amazing. An alternative and more accurate view on medicine which flies in the face of what we learn from academia, government, and of course, the BUCA cartel (third party payers).

by stoniff from United States

A thoughtful, in-depth analysis of current issues in healthcare.

08/04/2018
These doctors are the forefront of an evolving healthcare system and they are leading the charge. If you are looking to be informed about healthcare from the perspective of healthcare professionals, you should subscribe and listen.

by quiggmire from United States